"This is the email Scoop.it will send you. Then you can have your asst. or VA share each Scoop with your List of individually to engaged social connections w/ a personal touch"

"Select # of Post [5,10,15 or 20] Make sure to Add Share Buttons then click "send to me""

"Click the Blue Manage Dropdown and Select "Create a Newsletter""

"Very cool."

"We both have training. We like hot, stripper chicks!

Sent from my iPhone"

"Jeez so I am not so transparent hey?"

"I made it! Cool Video SEO is my big deal ;-)"

"That would be Task #2 in this list. 1) Go get urself an ifttt account 2) Search Recipe for G+ | Twitter 3) Clone it 4) Test it 5) Done"

"OK, so how to I get a post on G+ to automatically tweet? You just got my attention LOL"

"Surprise Obama only knows 23 people, he he"

"Following is not an endorsement."

"Drift is caught ;-)

Yes, most of the time the Google+ search results seem pretty relevant, but there are these anomalies like the example above that keep me scratching my head.

In related news, my agency is working on a tool we'll be releasing soon (for free!) that attempts to link relevancy for a keyword in someone's Google+ posts with (potential) relevancy for regular Google search (now that the two are tied together more closely). We're using a publicly-released version of the same semantic analysis tool that Google uses, and scraping the most recent posts of the given G+ user and then also scraping the page content of the top ten search results for the given keyword in Google search results. We then do a semantic and statistical analysis that results in a relevancy score."