Gmail Calendar Documents Photos Sites Groups Search More »
New Features | Help | Sign in
  
Explore
 
Recent Comments View All
"+Kenneth Hemphill: Parker's got it right - thermal mass is a WAY bigger factor in efficiency than playing games with air.
With adequate thermal inertia, the house does not feel 'drafty' - it feels like it's a warm spring day when you wake up, and you are surprised to look out and see fresh snow on the ground outside.
Compare the heat capacity of air to earth, fireclay mortar, or brick. And consider that healthy houses ventilate about 1/3 their volume per hour. You are going to exchange some air through the building envelope - you have to to stay alive. Why breath the stale air yourself, and feed the fire fresh air? Heating with air is a highly inefficient proposition - I think the only reason we do it is it's so easy to circulate, and hard to get it 'too' hot.
You can sit on the warm bench pictured, there is no 'draft' from the windows because an updraft from the bench counteracts the adiabatic cooling, and when the fire is going the barrel radiates like a woodstove. When the fire goes out, the bench is still warm all day and night. Conventional woodstoves tend to be located in the center of a room for best effect, leaving people with their backs to the cold walls and windows. I think that, and the problem of rapid cooling as the fire goes out, are what people complain about when they say the woodstove makes the room 'drafty'. I can have the door wide open, sit on my warm bench, and be cozy.
There are safe, and unsafe, ways to add an outside air intake to one of these mass heaters if it's a concern for a particular situation. There's plenty of room along the back of the warm bench for a heat-exchanging outside air vent, but I'd open it into the room rather than the heater. Mostly it ain't broke, so 'fixing' it causes more problems than it solves."
Erica Wisner
"It's my understanding that if the air coming into the combustion chamber is too cold, the efficiency drops. This setup (pictured) should be WAY more efficient than any kind of "traditional" wood burning stove. There are many reasons for this. If you haven't already, you ought to grab a copy of Ianto Evan's book about Rocket Stoves."
Parker Williams
"I'm curious whether this setup is more efficient than a wood burning stove with an outside air attachment. Wouldn't this stove would be even more efficient if you connected a vent from the outside wall to the burn hole and then had the ability to seal it tight? Right now, you're using inside air to fuel the fire."
Kenneth Hemphill
"wonderful~"
Wendy Bandurski-M...
"Hmmm... Not sure I understand, you might take a look at this cutaway: http://www.ernieanderica.info/rocketmassheaterpermitting/RocketHeater6in20000.jpg
The brick burn tunnel is hidden underneath the barrel, and there's an internal 'heat riser' that focuses the flame upward. The barrel collects the exhaust, sheds heat, and feeds it down to the ducts in the bench. The stainless stovepipe you can see is the end of this bench ducting."
Erica Wisner
Album Locations
RSS